Fifty Shades Darker

2017

Drama  Romance  

Synopsis


Downloaded 1,527,726 times
Uploaded By: OTTO
April 27, 2017 at 8:37 pm

Director

Cast

Dakota Johnson as Anastasia Steele
Jamie Dornan as Christian Grey
Rita Ora as Mia Grey
Marcia Gay Harden as Grace Trevelyan Grey
720p 1080p
961.72 MB
1280*720
English
R
23.976 fps
1hr 58 min
P/S 238 / 1,516
1.99 GB
1920*1080
English
R
23.976 fps
1hr 58 min
P/S 140 / 936

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by isledpena 9 / 10

50 shades darker ....

Two years ago, when I saw Fifty Shades of Grey, I knew this day would come, looming, like a dark, boring cloud on the horizon. If, for some strange and grotesque, you happened to enjoy the first movie, you'll like this one. If you are everyone else on the face the planet, yeah, it's just more of the same boring who-hockey that we've seen before. There is very little to like about this film.The good: Like the first movie, it's a slickly crafted movie with good aesthetics and a rad soundtrack..... Yeah, that's pretty much it.The good news is that it holds pretty close to the source material, the bad news is that it's almost as though the source material is bad Twilight fan fiction that some chick wrote on the notepad app on her iPhone....., oh wait, that's exactly what it is. I sh?? you not. This really isn't good. It makes less sense than anything I've seen in a long, long time.I cannot, in good conscience, recommend that you watch this under any circumstance.

Reviewed by henri61 9 / 10

drab, yet stylish

I saw it and yeah...I had fun, laughing I guess? For anyone who tells me that its a beautiful, love story...f*ck off. It was the cheesiest, corniest, most awkward-comedic film. But hey, it worked for a great comedy where the jokes on the film. Seriously, the scenes were so bad you couldn't help but laugh. I think FSoG was better in the aspect to take it a bit more "serious" than FSD. This film completely did not give a f*ck, I was disappointed that the plots and other characters (Mrs. Robinson, Jack Hyde, Leila) were weak! It had potential to explore more of these arcs, but it didn't. It was dull and so rushed! Everything was rushed. Even the sex! I'm not expecting full-blown porn but cut the soundtrack songs out, more positions (not just mostly missionary all the time), and please bring in some foreplay. How can a movie about risqué intimacy not show good foreplay? Why does Christian always have an un-emotional face while having sex? No climax either? In the books, wasn't he always grinning (or proudly smiling) for his accomplishment in giving Ana orgasms? For getting off too? None of that...it cuts straight to the next scene. Man...and why was it so Soap-Opera-ish?I'm not going to lie, I read the trilogy once and I was like, "whatever, this is the junk food to my brain". It wasn't good, but whatever... it served some purpose. Did I think that it was the greatest love story? Nope. Did I think it was a great romantic story? Nope. I was honestly intrigued by the fetish that surrounds BDSM. But it turned out, that even if the sex was hot, it wasn't even portrayed properly. BDSM is a whole other level.I was walking out and a lot of the viewers said that it did poorly in capturing the book. Like sure, the sex was there, but that connectivity...intimacy... was not. It was like : fight, bang (sex). Argument, bang. Present, bang again. It was repetitive in the sense of just make-up sex all the time. Ana is annoying. She doesn't know what she wants in the film or in life. Its like she can't take Christian's dark ways and not kidding, a few seconds later she's okay with it, without any solidifying reason (unless its going down on her or sex) . I feel like FSoG (2015) attempted some direction towards a woman's viewpoint. Like Ana being "dominant" in the sense of negotiation and choices. In this film, I'm sorry...she comes off like a gold-digger. She comes off like the only reason she's with him is because he's rich. Its like "I can't be with you, like this...(he gives her a gift), oh, I love you!) WTF? She tries so hard to be her own woman, but really ends up being Christian's (and not in the cute way like "Oh, I'm his girl *googly-eyes*) I feel that FSoG (2015) did a better job in where Ana had control and it made sense. Here it's wishy-washy.Its just a mess, not sexy, everything is rushed that you don't understand the reasoning behind motives. They cut off and rushed great moments and characters that could have given the film more sense, romance and great eroticism. Yes its funny because it tries so hard to take itself serious. But that's about it.

Reviewed by Femme_X 9 / 10

What a letdown...but funny in the worst way?

Billionaire businessman Christian Grey can't take no for an answer, especially from Anastasia. She's moved on with her life and has a new job, but it doesn't take much to such her back into the darker world. My main problem with the first film was that it had no story, but this time it does. The problem this time is that the story is terrible and badly enacted - from the far-too-easy being drawn back into a relationship, see- it-a-mile-off boss's sexual predatory, hilarious helicopter crash to the consistently unconvincing romance. The vague attempt at exploring Christian's backstory is laughably pointless too.The second problem, which can't be easily resolved is the casting. Johnson is so drippy, whiny and annoying, Dornan is wooden and dull, both of them lacking depth and personality. Put them together and it feels like a wax museum. Basinger is a great addition to the cast, but she gets absolutely nothing to do.Johnson said this movie is sexier than the first, but it's still less sexy than a skid mark. The greatest criticism is that there was a lot of laughter during the romantic and dramatic moments, no one can take it even slightly seriously. Foley has taken the wheel, but it's still just a sinking ship - the hole in the hull caused by EL James herself. Let's hope Freed won't be divided into two movies...1/5

Reviewed by Elliot George 9 / 10

? - less sexy than a skid mark

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

Read more IMDb reviews